Call of Duty: World at War | Teen Ink

Call of Duty: World at War

December 17, 2008
By Anonymous

Call of Duty usually makes a very good game but I don’t understand why they did not let activision make the new game. Call of Duty: world at war is one of the worst games I have ever played if not the worst. There is one thing on this game that I actually like and it is no reason to buy it.
There are many things that make it a bad game but the worst is the regestering system is horrible and they really don’t seem to be fixing it at all. It is really easy to get a kill but the number of times you get killed is very high also. And if you ever play on Xbox live the spawns will drive you up a wall. The only reason I play this game is because they added a game called zombies. This is the lone decent part of the game.
Call of Duty should just stick to letting activision make their game I bet they make a lot more money. It is never good when the older game is still better than the new one by a long shot. I would not recommend this game to anyone.

Similar Articles


This article has 1 comment.

on Jan. 1 2013 at 1:44 pm
TheGhost101 GOLD, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
17 articles 0 photos 3 comments

Favorite Quote:
"Let that child alone!"--Piccolo, Dragon Ball Z.

Actually, Activision is the publisher, and Treyarch was the developer of World at War. Although Infinity Ward is the original developer of Call of Duty, they and Treyarch rotate on Call of Duty games every year. In fact, the latest one, Black Ops II, was made by Treyarch. Also, you mispelled 'registering.' Did you really mean 'regenerating?'