All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
The Amityville Horror MAG
Take one haunted house, one creepy child, and a spooky murder scene, and what do you have? Possibly the most generic horror movie ever made. This 2005 remake of the classic “The Amityville Horror” did not even take a stab at creativity. Instead, they took a ridiculously generic plot line and waved gore and sex in front of our noses in hopes that we wouldn’t notice the lack of substance and agonizing predictability of this film.
The movie begins with the oh-so-common house shopping scene in which the happy family finds the house of their dreams for an almost-affordable price. The home is perfect – a huge Victorian, complete with an eerie forest, a self-unlocking boat house, and a cheery history of inter-family massacre.
Over the next few weeks, George (Ryan Reynolds), his wife Kathy (Melissa George), and her three children from a previous marriage, Billy, Chelsea, and Michael, begin to hear and see strange and horrible things. Chelsea develops an imaginary friend, who convinces her to play dangerous games (like climbing onto the roof). Kathy starts seeing cryptic messages in the fridge magnets. Worst of all, George is growing more and more hostile toward Kathy and her children. Is this change just a reaction to all the money he spent on this house, or is it something much more … stereotypical?
The film could have skidded by as a run-of-the-mill high-budget horror film if not for the petty whining for the viewers’ attention. Being, of course, a movie aimed at young adults, it plays host to the mandatory gratuitous sex scene, and on at least five occasions Ryan Reynolds mysteriously loses his shirt. Not to mention the convenient rainstorm that drenches Melissa George’s thin dress.
When it is not trying to distract the viewers with sex appeal, the film bombards us with gory special effects. Admittedly, the blood dripping from the light bulbs and the gruesome, rotting faces and limbs are well done, but rather useless without the support of a substantial plot.
The most painful part of this film, however, is the excruciating stereotypicality of it all. Nowadays, it is almost like there is a funny little man with a clipboard and a checklist wandering through the set of every horror movie. Haunted house? Check. Troubled family? Check. Creepy child? Check. Blatant cult symbols? Check. Excessive fake blood? Check. Man with a six-pack in the rain? Check. Original plot line? Hey, six out of seven is close enough.
In short, the scariest thing here is not the overdone special effects, or the satanic voices in air vents, or the family’s helplessness and vulnerability to the house’s dark whims. No, the truly terrifying thing about this film is that I wasted 90 minutes of my life watching it.
This movie is rated R.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 4 comments.
FINALLY SOME ONE WHO ISNT IMPRESSED BY THE SIMPLEST HORROR MOVIES.
GOD.
YES
THANKYOU!!
11 articles 0 photos 127 comments
Favorite Quote:
"Faith is taking another step without seeing the entire staircase."